I have nothing to hide, so I'll tell the true version of the story since you are writing fabrications.
I sent a private message to LadyJane yesterday (possibly the day before) and it said:
"Hi there!

I just wanted to let you know that you (might) want to remove the picture of Baylor
with the foster mom. If I see AJ in that picture I'm sure others will too."
Have a great day!
Julie
My purpose in sending that message to you was to bring to your attention that the foster mom looked like Angelina Jolie to me, and I didn't think you'd want any unwanted attention drawn to the board. I
never insinuated that Baylor was not a real foster, nor did the thought ever enter my mind at all. I simply thought he was a foster of AJ's since she's been known to foster many dogs (including Yorkies, Danes and Mastiffs as well). And I thought you may want to edit the picture that showed the foster parent (which you have since edited).
Your reply to me:
"What the (cuss word) are you talking about?"
Another reply:
"You and your (cuss word) comments..." (and it goes on)
I'd be more than happy to copy paste the entire conversation here for everyone to see the rest of the profanity you slung at me, but I don't think you'd want me to do that.
I stand by what I said. My reasons for writing to you in a
private message that you have now made public (and for which I now need to defend my statements) were heartfelt and completely innocent. Anyone here who knows me in the slightest knows I would
never say anything to purposely hurt anyone or cause "drama" as some rude person in this thread stated.
I feel it is wrong and inappropriate of you to accuse me of saying Baylor wasn't a real foster - that is 100% false and grossly inaccurate - I never said or insinuated anything of the sort. Admin are more than welcome to review our entire conversation to verify that - and I encourage them to.
I won't be visiting this thread again, but you are entirely in the wrong here...so much for me attempting to be helpful and getting this in return.