Quote:
Originally Posted by jp4m2  The problem with knowing if the vaccine is dangerous or not is the reporting of such problems is voluntary. The reporting is so poor it's estimated to be at only 1%. Trying to get the info from the manufacturer isn't really going to give a accurate picture of the problems, if any, without this valuable info.
Also vets are very reluctant to admit that the pharmaceuticals they administered might have been a problem so they tend to say it was just a coincidence. Until the reporting becomes mandatory we will never get the info we need to determine if a drug is worth using. |
Many times, reactions are handled by ER staff, not the doctor who administered the vaccine, and so the 'reaction' tends not to ever be 'linked' to the vaccine and/or reported to the doctor who vaccinated that patient, and may not be reported for these reasons also. Plus, adverse and/or 'inconvenient' documentation/complaints/etc. may fall victim to "misfiling" as well.
