[yorkietalkjilly]

It seems to me he was way overzealous and in the hunter mode, too, but I do want to hear everything there supposedly is before I judge him. I remember in past cases thinking someone was so guilty and later as things came out starting to change, realizing the defense will normally not release much info as the prosecution does beforehand so as to make maximum impact to the actual jury at the time of trial. There is that school of thought that it is best to reveal information that tries to explain the defendant's actions to the prospective jury pool & the public at large but most lawyers don't agree with that. So he does sound guilty now to me but I do want to wait and hear it all. At least we'll probably get to watch parts of the trial since it is in Florida. I just wonder if he can get a fair trial since the prospective jury members may be making up their minds now same as everybody else - from what we've all heard so far and are deciding from that and the circumstances we've all been told about & what seems logical based on that & the fact that he had a gun. After the Casey Anthony trial, I wonder whether all juries actually listen to all the evidence.