Quote:
Originally Posted by gracielove  I did not see one person on here say they thought it was alright to put a dog on top of the car in a carrier. Some said they did not agree with it but it was not something that they judged him as a candidate on. So if everyone agrees that it is wrong to put a dog on the top of a car in a crate to travel what is the problem? Wasn't there enough outrage expressed by everyone to make you happy?
Each person has a right to decide by their own conscience how they will judge a person. I don't think anyone even said they would vote for the man, they just didn't get as upset as others did.
I think many people are already tired of the political antics going on in this country and it is not even close to the election yet. I dislike politics and I hate to see what the political process does to some people. Many people have expressed their view here and everyone has a right to their opinion. There has been one consensus here and that is that no one believes that a dog should travel on the top of any vehicle. |
Not sure if this was directed at me? (I like the quotes; helps me know if I'm the one being asked the question.) If not, sorry about replying. If so, I will answer the question about making me happy.
I have been a staunch supporter of the "passion" expressed here at YT. When ppl have been accused of being "mean", I understood, chalking it up to their passion towards animal cruelty. I was glad to see a group of ppl who would speak for those who can't.
When it came to this thread and it seemed to me the act was being minimized or justified (and I think I was not the only one who got this impression). I could not understand why, as we as a group love animals so much and are not afraid to be their voice when they cannot speak.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I guess I fall into the passionate side of the treatment of animals.