I'm not really sure I understand the thought process here. Maybe someone can explain this to me bc I am having problems understanding.
There is a thread currently about a couple leaving their yorkies in the trunk of their car for 2-3 hours while they ate dinner. The conscensus was to my understanding - not a great decision on this couple's part.
Mr. Romney puts a dog all by itself, separated from its pack, on the roof of his car for a 12 hour trip. Things do come off of roofs due to the speed traveled on trips - I have seen that happen on the highway. This container would be subject to heat, cold, noises, and probably the feeling of the wind resistance on the vehicle. It is reported by his son the dog was so afraid he defecated so much that it was running down the back window. The dog was rinsed off and put back on the roof.
How does the set of facts surrounding Mr. Rommey's decision make a better decision than the first couple's?
Is it bc you personally like him? He is your same party affiliation? I honestly do not understand. It seems an inconsistent scale to me. |