Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  There are several different Biewer clubs, and some of the Biewer clubs have a poor reputation, while others have a good reputation, and don't won't to be confused with those clubs who have a poor reputation. To make it even more confusing is some of the groups changed names several times. In addition, it sounds like this person was managing the registry that some of the clubs used.  It would be like if a YTCA member found out an AKC manager was breeding dogs and abusing them, you just wouldn't want to be associated with the registry that had "managers" doing that.
I have tried to explain this the way I understand it. Please feel free to correct me. |
First of all, Tiffany has nothing to do with BTRA. Secondly, if a person is concerned with the management of an organization, then why does everyone place so much importance on AKC registrations, when everybody knows that they are major supporters of puppy mills and I don't even want to get started on the living conditions of some of the dogs that belong to AKC judges.
BTRA is the only Biewer registry that requires all breeding dogs to be DNA profiled although other registries claim to require it. It is a known fact that the other registry added Biewer in front of the Yorkshire Terriers that were in their pedigrees and changed the coloring to imply that they were breeding Biewer to Biewer.
When it's all said and done, at the end of the day, the only reason the BTCA is under constant attack, is because they are the only club that displays genuine concern for the breed. They have rules in place to protect the breed and will not settle for less.