Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  I don't think you can automatically say just because someone doesn't neuter they are a wreckless owner. How about all the breeders? Their definition is much clearer, "—these dogs were abused or neglected, not humanely controlled or contained, or allowed to interact with children unsupervised." That to me is wreckless. |
When i write, I think in terms of probabilities as in more likely, less likely etc. I think the world is probabilistic (not deterministic) and so with the statements that I make my intention is to say them in the sense of "more likely than not" and not "this or that". However, of course there's no way for you to know that unless I say so...sometimes I assume everyone can read my thoughts.
