View Single Post
Old 08-09-2011, 02:37 PM   #16
Yorkiesatwork
YT Addict
 
Yorkiesatwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jefferson
Posts: 284
Default

Where is the disconnect? The suffering and abandonment of helpless animals makes me sick... yet, as a business person wanting to support the efforts of the Humane Societyl, my choices are limited to helping raise funds for a giant shelter, with a $450,000 estimated operating cost per year. I soon found out that 'no kill' means that in the best of shelters, 80 to 85% of animals are euthanized... the 'no kill' refers to the keeping of animals deemed adoptable... aggressive, diseased, old, unattractive, animals are euthanized on the spot -- to the tune of 4,000 to 5,000 animals a year. Wouldn't we be better served with a mandatory, free or almost free spay/neuter ordinance that would prevent these animals from ending up in the shelter to begin with?

The answer: There would be no voter support by male citizens for the mandatory neutering of their dogs! OMG!
Yorkiesatwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!