View Single Post
Old 01-04-2006, 01:01 PM   #35
JCarlson2004
Mommy To 3 Poochies
Donating Member
 
JCarlson2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 8,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hunniebunnie
it's been said before, but i thought it's good to reiterate again.

the controversy "against tinies" is NOT AGAINST THE OWNERSHIP of tinies... i mean, most people are willing to admit they'd love to own a tiny because they're so cute due to their diminuative size.

the controversy is NOT AGAINST A BREEDING PROGRAM FOR tinies. it's a simple case of market supply and demand. many love to own tinies so even reputable breeders with safe breeding practices can have breeding program that will consistently result in litters of tinies. nothing wrong with meeting the needs of the public so long as it is done in a responsible manner.

the controversy is NOT AGAINST THE BREEDING OF MALE tinies. most will agree that the best way to breed and result in tiny yorkies is to have a good size dam and a tiny sire. no arguement there.

the controversy IS AGAINST THE BREEDING OF FEMALE tinies, making them mothers and subjecting them to health hazards for the sake of having tiny babies.
Excellent post! This is EXACTLY the message that I was trying to convey. Well said!
__________________
Mommy Loves Codie, Tia & Baby Cali
RIP My Precious Katie - I Love You
JCarlson2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!