Quote:
Originally Posted by gidget529  I don't know how these ppl could have reviewed all of the evidence and compared it to all of the charges in that short amount of time. Not only was she murdered Caylee brought against her (premeditated/first degree), but a count of felony child abuse or attempt to commit felony child abuse - in Florida that constitutes murder in the first degree if the child dies during abuse or attempted abuse. How did they clear her of that?
There was also manslaughter brought against her; that is Caylee's death was in the care of her mother and resulted from her mother's actions/inability to care for or supervise. How did she not get convicted of that?
I don't think this jury understood or took the time to carefully review ALL charges brought against her and what the definitions of these charges were. Perhaps taking some notes would have helped! |
Right!!! By the way, did you post comments on a you tube video? Your user name reminds me of one there.
Think about this....
on Sunday the jury heard the first part of the closing statement from the prosecution, and then heard FOUR hours of the defense's closing statement. Recess for the day.
Monday the jury came in to court ALL DRESSED UP. This is before they even finished hearing from the prosecution. They also came ALL DRESSED UP on Tuesday...the day they announced their verdict.
These are jurors that always dressed casually in tennis shoes, etc...coming in wearing ties and high heels. They made up their mind about "reasonable doubt" on SUNDAY after the defense made their statement.
It feels like a series of unfortunate events. The jurors did NOT seriously deliberate. I don't think they even seriously listened to the prosecutions closing. They had ALREADY made up their mind.
Just wanted to add: To the jurors...SHAME ON YOU!!! You have Caylee's blood on your hands, in my opinion.