Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  Exactly. Also why would it be hidden? Why would her dad hide it, sure they made a case that Casey would hide it, cause she's a liar, but why would the father hide it? |
I don't understand...there are lesser charges she could have gotten...all the prosecution would've had to do is prove that Casey had SOME involvement in her death and given the amount of evidence against her...I'm sorry but here is what I'm having trouble with:
1) She doesn't report her daughter missing for 31 days
2) She LIES about her daughter's whereabouts aka Zanny the Nanny
3) THEN all of a sudden after lying about the whereabouts she says that her father and brother raped her?
4) The child is found six months later with HER BLANKET AND DUCT TAPE?
HOW CAN THIS WOMAN GET OFF WITH ONLY TWO YEARS?!
THAT IS MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE FOR AGGRAVATED CHILD ABUSE...it is HER RESPONSIBILITY AS A PARENT TO ENSURE THE WELL-BEING OF HER CHILD AND HER CHILD WENT MISSING FOR A MONTH BEFORE SHE EVEN OPENED A WORD ABOUT IT...AND IT WAS HER MOTHER WHO FORCED HER INTO TELLING THE POLICE ABOUT CAYLEE? HOW DOES THAT NOT PROVE NEGLECT?!?!
And I'm really tired of people saying there wasn't enough evidence...juries have convicted on far less.