Quote:
Originally Posted by Taryn0405  Yeah this is blowing way out of proportion...
The post went from being upset with Blockbuster due to the manager's lack of social and management skills to debating whether or not emotional needs for a dog is ethical in regards to bringing a dog into a store with them.
I love bringing my dog in stores with me, but if I'm asked to get out, I get out. I don't boycott the store necessarily,but Gizmo is ususally with me when I go somewhere so I won't be returning anytime soon. Woop-de-frickin-do.
I don't think anyone on this thread is finding a "loophole" with regards to service dogs. Do I think there are people out there that do take advantage of it? Absolutely! But sadly we do live in a world of liars and a-holes that have a tendency to ruin it for everyone else. Once again, woop-de-frickin-do.
The joy of posting on a public thread is there are many times you don't agree with what someone said. But, whatever that's the joy of an opinion. But geez talk about straying away from the original topic and blowing something way out of proportion. |
Maybe it doesnt matter to YOU, BUT IT MATTERS TO ME AND MY SON. You can be blaise all you want about it, but the OP never mentioned having a disability and therefore it shouldnt have been brought up. You cant just train any animal to do tasks and say, its a service dog. ESD maybe but service dog, NO....All I said that I wouldnt want the wrong person to get the ideal that they can "train" a dog into being a service dog simply to have them accompany them where ever they feel the dog should go.