Quote:
Originally Posted by gidget529  Can anyone believe what just happened? Last pm, George and Cindy's atty claimed they believe she is not innocent but do not want death penalty - which atty/client priviledge had to be waived for him to comment like that.
Then today, Cindy gets on stand and claims her work's records of her time worked/time paid for are not correct and that she "may have been home" and was the one at home searching for chloroform!! Amazing!! Gee, I wonder if what atty said last night was a preemptive statement anticipating her contradictory testamony today??? Unbelievable!!  |
This is really unbelievable. I mean we are talking three years later and for the first time the mother is now claiming this?? Something is just off, and you have to wonder what in the world is going on.
I can understand that you do not want your child to get the death penalty, but that doesn't mean you tell a bunch of lies. If they think she is guilty do they want her to go free?
My Mother would not lie for us if we murdered someone, especially our own child. She would love us, but she would not lie or cover anything up.
I'm not watching the trial firsthand, so I'm just reading recaps, but isn't Cindy a nurse? She was looking stuff up pertaining to a car accident a friend supposedly had? Huh!
And she was supposedly at work, so I don't get it. Is it just they are trying to save her from the death penalty or are they worried what she may testify to if she takes the stand!
I mean she murdered their grandchild, and is claiming her dad and brother sexually abused her, geez!