Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  I'm hoping she will, I don't know the law that well, but I don't think she has to prove that she didn't do it, or even that it happened another way. Don't they just have to poke holes in the prosecuting attorney’s story, as in reasonable doubt? I think she really wants to testify, but most lawyers would never recommend it. She seems so narcissistic and egotistical and has been such a successful liar in the past, that I think, she thinks, she can convince the jury.
One thing that bugs me about her defense is that she saying she’s a liar because of the alleged molestation in the past, yet we’re supposed to believe her now? |
I think you're right - I think she's one of those ppl who is so confident in her lying that she thinks she can talk her way in and out of anything. You would think getting caught stealing her grandmother's and friend's money plus how her lies about working, etc., were found out she would have had an "ah ha" moment by now!
Quote:
Originally Posted by chachi I think she will testify. They say when they show or give certain testimony or pictures of Caylee and the jury is out of the room she doesnt cry but when they bring the jury back in and show it she crys that tells me all I need to know about her. Im just afraid she is going to get acquitted because the defense does seem to be getting alot of testimony conflicting with the prosecution on the forensics |
I've seen that too watching some of the live coverage. When the jury is out of the room, she will look at the monitor when they show pics of deceased Caylee, but when the jury is back in the room, she will look away and not look at pics, fake cry - it really makes you wish the jury could see everything to help them come to their decision!