Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999 I'm hoping she will, I don't know the law that well, but I don't think she has to prove that she didn't do it, or even that it happened another way. Don't they just have to poke holes in the prosecuting attorney’s story, as in reasonable doubt? I think she really wants to testify, but most lawyers would never recommend it. She seems so narcissistic and egotistical and has been such a successful liar in the past, that I think, she thinks, she can convince the jury.
One thing that bugs me about her defense is that she saying she’s a liar because of the alleged molestation in the past, yet we’re supposed to believe her now? |
I think she will testify. They say when they show or give certain testimony or pictures of Caylee and the jury is out of the room she doesnt cry but when they bring the jury back in and show it she crys that tells me all I need to know about her. Im just afraid she is going to get acquitted because the defense does seem to be getting alot of testimony conflicting with the prosecution on the forensics