Quote:
Originally Posted by Reese1  I wonder if she will testify. I don't see how she can avoid it. I don't see how the jury could possibly buy the story that this child drowned, but then not have her testimony to tell this fabricated story.
To raise this and the alleged sexual abuse, and this explanation without anything to back it up. I don't see it! |
I'm hoping she will, I don't know the law that well, but I don't think she has to prove that she didn't do it, or even that it happened another way. Don't they just have to poke holes in the prosecuting attorney’s story, as in reasonable doubt? I think she really wants to testify, but most lawyers would never recommend it. She seems so narcissistic and egotistical and has been such a successful liar in the past, that I think, she thinks, she can convince the jury.
One thing that bugs me about her defense is that she saying she’s a liar because of the alleged molestation in the past, yet we’re supposed to believe her now?