Quote:
Originally Posted by kpstoybox  Your original question.... Just curious . . .
How is "Madison" perfectly marked as a Biewer when there is no white and Biewers are req'd to have absolutely white legs?
I realize Breny said "her puppies" were beautifully marked like some Biewers. And she did include a pic of a black and tan yorkie with the three tri's.
However, common sense told me that she was talking about the pups that were actually marked like Biewers. Madison is not a Parti, Biewer or even mis-marked. She doesn't have a speck of white on her. Who would confuse her with a Biewer? 
Your question (well intentioned or not), IMO...might cause some confusion to those just learning about the Parti and Biewer. I was just clearing up any confusion, that your confusion may have caused for others. 
How's this? Madison is a traditional colored littermate to the three purebred AKC reg parti yorkie pups that are beautifully marked like a Biewer. Better? |
Exactly. I wasn't sure how Breny considered Madison perfectly marked as if she were a Biewer when she had no white -
nothing about registration. I thought it looked like a standard pup - no mismarkings - so I asked
Breny maybe I misunderstood the Biewer Standard or it had been changed or indeed she included extra photos.
She clarified. No more needed.
But then you said (as clarification
) she is AKC registered as if that was the relevant to my question to
Breny about color and that it correlated with not being a tri. LOL Not true. Well intentioned or not, your response was irrelevant to my question to
Breny causing confusion, especially if you're just learning.
Again
Breny answered that she posted a traditional even though she said she was posting tri's marked perfectly as if Biewers. That's it. No need to confuse with registration etc. LOL
All good...