Quote:
Originally Posted by DvlshAngel985  If UCLA chooses to punish her in any way, they have the right to do so. Whe a student accepts to attend any school in the UC system, they agree to abide by the UC code of conduct. If UCLA finds this girl violated the UC or UCLA's code of conduct, the girl is violating a contract. So what you're saying is it's ok to violate the university's rules, which is a contract we students enter with the university, that every student agrees to, as long as we (students) claim it's our first amendment right to do so? I'm just asking, because everyone seems to forget that little part. Every school has it's rules that students must follow. Upon review, if UCLA finds this video to be in direct violation of the student code of conduct, it will be up to them to figure it out. This girl can always appeal. If anything, I think this video will have the UC Regents review and alter the student's code of conduct to include problems that can and have come to be due to social networking on he Internet. |
That may be so, I don't know. But the "court of public opinion" is going to be much harsher on her than anything UCLA will or won't do. She had better start re-planning her life, because from this point on it is going to be vastly different from whatever she was planning before this video came out, and she has only herself to blame.