Quote:
Originally Posted by FlDebra 
I also find it unethical (even if it only by my own ascribed set of standards -- which Wylie's mom has said does not make mine wrong even if others --presumably even the moderator-- disagrees with me) for someone to use their moderator powers in the same posts they are stating their case in such a heated debate, time after time. I wholeheartedly agree that moderators deserve the right to their own opinion ON ANY issue, but it is highly out of the ordinary to argue with the same people you are deleting, admonishing and closing their threads. It becomes very difficult to see where the "edict of the moderator" stops and "personal opinion" starts. I apprecate that Wylie's Mom owning a tri-color dog herself, makes for a difficult predictment. Perhaps someone else could exercise moderator powers in threads where one moderator wants to engage in debate?? Just asking and again, just my opinion and suggestion -- not in any way saying I would not accept what already is in place. Just throwing an idea out for consideration.
|
Debra, we'll never agree on the subject of parti breeding and what constitutes ethical breeding, I can accept that and still be friendly. But, I've never had any difficulty discerning between Ann's moderator edict, and her personal opinion. I've never seen any evidence of Ann deleting, admonishing or closing threads on the basis of her opinion regarding parti yorkies, or other subjects for that matter.
Ann's ability to remain fair and impartial is exactly what makes her the person Admin trusts to moderate this forum. For you to suggest otherwise just baffles me
