[megansmomma]

Originally Posted by jrsygal37

That may be true but it is involving people that have closed the matter and are now being brought back into it, not to mention by a person who has no first hand knowledge of anything that happened. I don't think that's fair that for one it should have been allowed to reopen to begin with, and for two be allowed to continue.

I requested the first thread be close and it was allowed to be restarted. That's not fair and at my request (And I think it's a reasonable one) it should be deleted as it should not have been allowed to be restarted to begin with.

If I am correct the only member that is allowed to request a thread closed is the OPer who is now suspended. Funny thing about this entire thread is I never really put the pieces together until yesterday when Drbollittle linked all of these people together. If you then go back to your original thread we can now link one more person into this mess. Another(breeder) member who posted she spoke directly to Glenda.

Take a look at this:

http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/3386661-post96.html

and this

http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/3386672-post100.html

oh and then there is this too when Glenda who is not internet suave not only came on YT to read but then contact her with her closed page or via her site that doesn't include a phone number

http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/3386672-post100.html

Here is a snippet of what was posted and I am referring to above.

I do not know these breeders, she contacted me last night after reading Yorkietalk and informed me about all the shots that were given to Mia, I couldn't believe it, so she sent me the vet statements.

I just love intrigue and this story keeps getting better and better by the minute. I've got an excellent memory and can recall small details like a Parti breeder claiming to have never spoken to another Yorkie/Parti breeder/seller/broker/miller or whatever you would like to call Glenda. Makes me go HMMMMMM what's really going on here? Why would someone who has no previous involvement vehemently come to the defense of Glenda after speaking to her for the very first time

I'm sure she will be right along now to attach that so I'm going to But then again it wouldn't be the first time I was given one of those for questioning someone.