[cj125]

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

What the bottom line is When Rosemark sold Marshall with full breeding rights and no contract then the purchaser/owner can do anything she wants to with said dog. There was no Contract.
So by that, then she could do anything she wanted to with the dog.
Since there was no contract how can you blame someone for purchasing him?

You are right except that there is a Code of Conduct within the Yorkshire Terrier community which has been clearly violated. (http://www.ytca.org/ethics2.html #10)

They may call it code of conduct but I call it "ethics"!

I have nothing against Biewers and I appreciate that people are trying to get their dogs recognized by AKC as a breed but I don't appreciate seeing other people's lives thrown in the gutter because some people feel as though they can "do anything they want" with no consideration for what came before them. It's dishonorable!

I'm just curious but... how would you feel if 30 years from now someone bought one of your CH's and decided to make a few bucks off of your years of breeding and showing by mixing it with a Dachsund but still use your kennel name... Honestly - how would you feel?

(Please correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the lady who purchased the dog from Rosemark was a member of a couple of Yorkie clubs)