[kjcmsw]

Asking for opinions:
Because I wouldn't want my pups to end up dumped in a shelter or worse, I plan to ask that the buyers return the pup to me first should they no longer want it/unable to care for it - will return their money..."within reason" This is all based on the pup would be sold in a healthy condition/no issues, etc and is being returned 'just because' (I guess).
Buyers want to know/expect seller to provide vet records that pup is healthy...is it a fair expectation of the seller when offering to return the money that the pup come back healthy also - 'essentially' in the same condition it was sold? ----> so here's my question:
Such as (example purposes only): 2/3 months post sale the new owners are moving (whatever excuse) and decide they can no longer care for pup...but they bring it back infested in fleas...is it a reasonable expectation that the costs to de-louse the pup comes out of the money expected to be returned? (assuming in this example the pup obviously didn't leave the seller to the buyer with fleas) What other things are reasonable? They wanted a vet record pre sale, does it go both ways...the seller should expect a vet record in return?
What types of things/conditions do you place on returning people's money?
I'm thinking they're are more likely to return a pup to the seller if they at least believe they'll get some of their money back.