Quote:
Originally Posted by brendarash  I can only comment on the taste of the wild because I was in petssmart over the weekend and ask the manager the same thing. She said the taste of the wild is a great food but they do not recommend it unless your dogs gets a lot more exercise to burn off the calories. She said the Blue, small breed was the best for little dogs that do not get a lot of exercise. That is my group. They are not big outside pups.they said that in petsmart the dog food is set up in isle by isle with the premium food in the first isle. She did show me a chart from Blue, that showed the same thing that she told me.Good Luck. Oh b the way my guys seems to like it real good. But of course I add to each of there food bowls,a tablespoon of boiled chicken,and bit of chicken broth, and a few small (about 4 pieces) of sweet potatoes. on top. They love that. The dry food does have veggies and sweet potatoes already in it. Good luck |
That's not really true
In general, Petsmart employees don't especially know what they're talking about when it comes to nutrition. Also, BB Small Breed has MORE protein and more fat than a few formulas of TOTW.
TOTW is not even *that* high protein/calorie/fat, compared to other grain-free foods. But with higher calorie foods, you simply feed less. That's the greatness of them... you don't use as much so you're really spending more money. The recent recall on BB kind of scares me too... but they caught it early so it's probably not a huge deal.
The comparison is not that different:
Blue Buffalo Small Breed
Crude Protein 29.0% min
Crude Fat 16.0% min
TOTW Sierra Mountain:
Protein: 25% Fat: 15%
TOTW High Prairie:
Protein: 32%
Fat: 18%