Quote:
Originally Posted by concretegurl 
If you say you are not against a dog just against breeding it...how does that make sense...then you are again the pups..by default that dog's lineage and that dog no? Not against the dog but it's breeding...but it's parents breeding were you against that...why were they sick...carried a genetic disorder...a fault...the only fault was color?!?
|
What you again fail to miss is that no one is against the DOGS. The dogs had no say on whether they were bred poorly or not. What people are against is the breeder who feels the need to try to make a buck breeding purposely on a fault. It's really no different than someone who purposely breeds cobble bodied, bobble headed, Hello Kitty faced tinies. Sure, they may be AKC registered, but that sure isn't worth the paper it's printed on, is it?
Change for the sake of change. And if you can make a buck off of it, so much the better.