I wasn't suggesting it, I
really meant it, to
those who disapprove of her. My comment was addressing the imperative generalizations that were posted. I said "even
those who disapprove of her" (meaning her, and/or the partis -- of which, she is one). I know for a fact that people here *do* disapprove of her, specifically, bc I've read the specific comments that were about her directly. It may not be on the open forum, but they've been shared with me. And btw, I don't include you in what I'm saying here...you and I have PMd about this privately, and it has always been an extremely positive exchange
.
I can't really believe you just said that, but okay
. I'm 'playing a card'? I meant what I said, and believe me - I don't consider it a game or a 'card' that I like to throw down, when it suits my whimsy. If you do genuinely feel I'm playing some sort of card, then I respect your feelings - as I won't disrespect you by implying your feelings are somehow wrong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When someone calls parti owners "SUCKERS", I'm confident and peaceful in expressing
my opinion regarding that statement.
As in all cases, opinions about these kinds of subjects are welcome here at YT as they add to a lively and educational discussion.
Anyone is welcome to disapprove of partis, Biewers, labs, morkies, shorkies, dorkies, yorkies, lemurs,
whatever. However, imperative generalizations like the one I was addressing don't often lend themselves to a discussion, *in my opinion*
.
Enjoy the discussion!
