View Single Post
Old 12-23-2010, 02:13 PM   #36
concretegurl
Between♥Suspensions
Donating Member
 
concretegurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vaissades
Posts: 7,979
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Breezeaway View Post
He did not say the genetic make up is asasBBCCDDEEGGmmSStt. He said it likely is. Here is what he says in his book.
That's because the technology for the actually proven testing was not available so a hypothesis sufficed then, well testing was available but the reliability-things that make you want to say hmmmmmmmmmmm? Who's doing this research now?

Would love to see advancements in the feild of Canine genetics, weather it be genetic marker tracking, DNA, breed identification, and many more useful this areas...even ending the great debates over whom is and isn't a Yorkie, their origin, mysteries surrounding white coloration, tricolor etc (exclusion of color mutations-they are a separate genetic issue that is well know and research). I wouldn't say just because some research was old it was not useful-personally-but I wouldn't bank it either-that seems like common sense to me.
concretegurl is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!