Quote:
Originally Posted by kjcmsw  Good to know my pups are probably more valuable than I originally thought. I still don't think one can -- or should --- say negative things "as a fact" or even "imply" by underhanded little comments that someone couldn't produce an exceptional dog per the way they have chosen to describe that dog, or that their pups may not be of high quality because they don't support non-factual statements being thrown out willy-nilly.
And yeah, back to the original post, shipping cargo seems very risky to me also. |
The last sentence makes this look directed at me, since I hd just posted "to get back to the original posters subject. Which would have been nice. I was not surprised that you did not answer ANY of my questions but I am surprised at you insinuating or is it coming right out and accusing me of saying negative things "as a fact" or "implying underhanded comments!" Why don't you say what you mean instead of this vague accusation style? I have no idea what you are trying to get at. I have not made any comments about a particular person other than what I suggested you MIGHT want to re-evaluate. I have not said any particular breeder could or could not produce anything -- exceptional or otherwise. I have given my experience and my opinions on things to check into further. Why is that so threatening to you?