[evab]

Originally Posted by Woogie Man

I've only watched part of the film so will only comment generally. The problems I've seen discussed are not so much a result of in-breeding but one of a standard among some breeds that is detrimental to the dog's health. I think it's good that standards are being reviewed but but broad statements against breeding practices aren't helpful and won't fix the problems.

For instance, I don't know of any major health issues with the Yorkshire Terrier that are attributable to the breed standard. They are a toy breed and are more delicate than a more robust dog but i wouldn't call that a health issue that merits a change in standard.

It's painting with far too large a brush to call for changes in breeders' individual breeding practices. In-breeding, line-breeding and out-crossing are all just tools that a breeder may use. The results will vary depending on the knowledge of the breeder but the practice of these methods is neither good nor bad in and of itself.

As an example, the seeing eye dogs of Morristown, NJ are one of the most in-bred groups of dogs with a high breeding co-efficient yet they are one of the healthiest groups of dogs anywhere. This is due to rigorous health testing and intelligent selection of breeding stock.

As I mentioned earlier, I have no issue with reviewing breed standards as they pertain to the health of a breed. However, the problem must be correctly identified before practical solutions can be found.