Quote:
Originally Posted by concretegurl  Ye I read the links you posted...(1)This forum is actually the only time I have ever responded directly to you, about information in your posts, only because it was so important for obvious safety reasons (I felt) I responded to...
....(2) I simply wanted factual information presented but that's neither here nor there now.(3) I see you revised later stating you looked it up again and FL law changed, however maybe I just didn't refresh in time to see your revision and wanted to have it known it was illegal (now).....Please keep on the topics and stop posting like this to me in forums....... (4)I don't feel you are 'following me around' but you did make a point to contradict whatever I said in several other forums after I responded here contradicting you-again which was to contradict you personally just to make sure people knew it was in fact illegal and offer clarification to what the law actually is...that was all. I will make a point to not comment directly to you, or your posts ever again to avoid such silliness. Look how long these posts are and how off topic they have gotten. (5) Also please don't call me names such as a used car-salesman and a bully-it's just unnecessary-especially when I was talking to someone else offering some solution to them trying to be nice. ... |
I numbered some of your claims here and as I tried to explain them to you one last time.
Oh for Heaven's sake --
you are getting out of hand! (1) There are 2 threads where we seem to have gotten under each other's skin. You are most definately replying directly to me there as well as here. In one sentence you say this is the ONLY thread where you are responding directingly to me and then in another sentence of the same post you claim there are several forums where I am contradicting you??? (4) I don't know what the heck you are talking about with this "several other forums!" I asked you to tell me where they were. Unanswered. It is best to have a reference, proide a link, or at least have some sort of basis when you make wild accusations or argue facts with another member
You did not need to contradict me here as I said what happened years ago, said what the current law was and did not need corrected or have someone jump in with
wrong information like you did saying the back of a pickup was not a cargo area. That was just plain trying to be contentious as there was no good to come of it even if you had been right, which you were not! You saw my correction, you even quoted just a small part of it taken out of context! You saw that I had listed what the law used to be and then mentioned that I tried to amend the post with current law but had to go to a new post to do so, so you USED that situation to jump. Very unattractive quality.
11:32 am I said that the police told me it was not against the law
a few years back, which they did.
11:45 am I decided to post the
current law quickly so as not to give anyone the wrong impression. And I gave a link to the reference!
11:48 am (3) Edited to correct a typo -- nothing MORE! All done well in advance of your first post to jump on me that you made at 12:28 am. Do you forget it is all time-stamped?
12:28 am YOU Said it was illegal all across the state -- actually posted incorrect information (2) saying that only 2 states had minimal restrictions. Adults can ride in the back of pickups without restriction, in some circumstances so can children and I still find no law against dogs (especially if tethered with 2 tethers). So even when you try to correct, it is not with good info. I did
not call you a used car salesman. (5) I said you came back at another member 4 times trying to change her mind. I said used car salesmen are trained to take 7 no's but I did not think that would work here.
Sense of humor?????? I did not even call you a bully. I did say something about bullying someone with repetitive attempts to change their mind. That is not really the same thing. But closer than it was when you said I called you a used car salesman, I guess.
This is from the other argumentative thread. Why bring it here? Certainly no other motive than to stir crap. You know I did not call you a used car salesman -- you are just twisting again to try to make it look bad for me when all it does is make your attempt look ridiculous! Untruth never goes over well.
I will say I think you have a problem. Seriously! You twist the truth to try to justify what you say and do. When I call you on something you just ignore it -- don't answer, don't provide proof, just continue to make up and twist information. You admited you had an issue with needing to control in another thread, but this is ridiculous. I have not in any way tried to single you out. I have continued to answer your posts directed to me. If you don't want me to post to you, then stop making up things and posting them to me.
If anything I have let things go!!! You have other threads where you have popped off with absolutely
FALSE information too -- like arguing with another member and saying only Japan and the US guarantine dogs (another example of (2) )-- no one else does anymore, you said! That is not true, yet you argued with another YT member about it without any facts to back you up. I let it go because you had made this claim that I was following you around (4) -- which is just plain weird. There are more examples! You have been busy recently and not very factual! But I tried to let them slide, and instead tried to answer your false accusations in these two threads. I asked you nicely to stop this on the forum. I asked you to PM if you felt you wanted to make any more false accusations or do some more "non-arguing." It doesn't belong here. You are adding nothing valuable!
Pls do as I ask and go through the personal message system for any further communication of this ilk. The forum deserves better.