Quote:
Originally Posted by chachi  No it was started because someone on there said she thought the people she knew that were comfortable took care of the pets better. I am middle income and Im not comfortable but I am able to take care of my pets to the best of ability. I also dont think you have to be comfortable to have a savings or make the best choices for your pet. I liked Ellie Mays post and there does seem to be a difference in what some people consider adequate care. And yes they are yorkies but in the end they are also a dog with a dogs needs |
Chachi -- she ONLY said that in answer to someone who said rich people DID not take care of their pups and always boarded them when they went somewhere. She was only answering that
OF THE PEOPLE SHE KNEW the ones with money took their dogs with them and were inclined to do even more for them. She did not say all rich people did or poor people didn't. This is all getting so blown out of perspective it is not funny.
I reiterate -- the things people are talking about do not depend on MONEY! If you had lots of money, I am sure you would still take great care of your dogs. It is about your HEART and not about your money. There are people with less money still taking great care of their dogs because they are willing to do whatever it takes. It is in their heart. There are also people without the money to do it no matter how much they might want to, or how much they might cut backon other things, there may not be anything to cut back on -- they still have HEART but -- they should not own a yorkie.