View Single Post
Old 09-27-2010, 03:37 PM   #1
FidoTheYorkie
YT 500 Club Member
 
FidoTheYorkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hafnafjörður, Iceland , North Europe
Posts: 728
Default Royal Canin vs. Hill's

What is better, Royal Canin or Hills?

Fido has almost always been on Royal Canin, I've tested Purina ProPlan also, ProPac and Hills.
Royal Canin is the only thing i've found yet that's good for him, he has a weighting proplem so he doesnt need much to be overwheight
Now he is on Royal Canin Obesity food, I'm making him loose wheight, when he will be in good shape I'll put him on Royal Canin Mini Light so he doesnt get fat again.

Is Hills any better than Royal Canin?
Its just either Royal Canin or Hills for him because he needs special food, if i give him ''normal'' dog food (not light or obesity) he gains wheight fast !
He gained 1 and a half kilos on 3 months! and he's a YORKIE , not a Labrador or something.
He gained so much cause i put him on ProPlan for 2-3 months,i bought that food cause it was much cheaper, but now i see that its much better to buy more expensive food.

When he was on Hills he was on obese food so i cant tell how it is, his fur was not so good and he pooped alot more, then the vet said that he was suppose to do that, i dont know what to believe.

Is Royal Canin bad dog food?
I've seen people who just dont want to feed their dogs Royal Canin because of something i dont know, I've always thought that Royal Canin was the best dog food available.
__________________
Sun [Owner] ,Fido [Yorkie] ,Mímir [Chinese Crested] ,Kría [Icelandic cat] ,Skuggi [Forrest cat]
FidoTheYorkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!