Quote:
Originally Posted by Cares4Dogs  she cant go back in the past and change anything about the decisions prior breeders made in their lines. Is this breeder to blame? certainly not...she had no involvement or knowledge of that. Possibly the parents of her sire were sold under suspicious pretenses after she had already obtained her sire. She is not to blame here for that. |
No, she is NOT to blame for that. I don't see where anyone is trying to claim that she is responsible for the dogs being auctioned off. And it wasn't just "a" dog. It was multiple dogs, in the same auction from BOTH sides of the sire's pedigree. She may not have known that was the case at the time, but she does now. She IS responsible for what she does after being privy to that informaiton.
Would someone being justified in continuing to breed a dog from lines with LS or from a questionable background all because they didn't know the facts when they acquired the dog?
I think that is the point trying to be made here. It's just something to take into consideration.