Quote:
Originally Posted by peachbongi
Going from caves to where we are today has been pain staking. It was not done over night. There were mistakes made along the way.
I am simply stating that are we willing to take that risk? We are already out of the cave.
Have we REALLY seen Biewers and Partis long enough to know of any hidden dangers? Again, if you research the history of the Yorkie you will know the breed was not come about over night. We are talking hundreds of years.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Quote: Originally posted by Elle
I'm glad you brought that up. You talk about changing our standard. Standards are almost never changed. You are asking us to change it to alter to to allow something we do NO want in our breed.
Last and most important because you just are not getting this. We are not in a cave, it's not us, it's is YOU that won't listen. We just changed our standard. We just changed it. We just changed it intentionally to make sure that you would know: we do NOT WANT any kind of white dog in our ring. There is nothing more to talk about. You are intentionally breeding a faulted dog for profit. Sugar coat it with the finest sugar cane you still have a disqualified dog. Sneak it in, dye it, whatever the horrible ethics drive you to do. You still have a dog that isn't accepted by any of the hundreds of thousands of people in the dog fancy. Not so ingenious, just another person looking for the shortcut in life.
Showing our breed is difficult. It's hard to do. I've yet to find a real show person interested in this white dog. It's just to sell puppies.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not trying to add to the argument but, Elle, I think Peachbongi was advocating for NOT changing the standard to allow variations. If you re-read her post, I think it was in reply to someone who is for changing. |