View Single Post
Old 09-05-2010, 10:49 AM   #274
yorkiegirl2
YT 2000 Club Member
 
yorkiegirl2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooklynn View Post
Maybe the dam is the parti carrier because it just says Hylan and not Hylan Acres, it appears to be the carrier because I know Ann always uses the kennel name Hylan Acres and not just Hylan. Just because it was a Hylan Acres sire doesn't mean it was from that sire. I know Ann isn't breeding for Parti's and she's not advocating the Parti's and I'm sure she would have spayed neutred had she known the sire and the dam as the carrier would produce a Parti. DNA would not show a parti carrier as there is no marker for color just as in LS there is no marker. DNA is just to prove parentage and not the carrier. I see the dam's side is the one with the very least amount of Champions so therefore it appears to me the sire's side is being taken advantage of and blamed. But of course this is all my opinion and one can take it as they see fit. I am still not for the breeding of Parti's as it is not the breed standard.
Come on Donna you are reaching.
It states quite clearly on the pedigree who the breeder was,
Hylan’s darling Diva was bred by Ann.
Diva was sire by Ch Durrer’s Mighty Obsession and Bubbles LarueII
(Bubbles also sired by a Durrer dog).
Since we know it takes 2 gene carriers to produce Parti’s, it means that not only was the Hylan dog a carrier but so was the Durrner dog .
And I really don’t think Betty Ann Durrer was into mix breeding do you ???
yorkiegirl2 is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!