[cj125]

Originally Posted by yorkielady06

Now I wanted to quote the original poster here to make sure that I got this right. The OP states that she DID NOT have a contract with this dog. She sold him with full registration. She trusted this person and that person broke her trust and she will now change her ways of selling show dogs and maintain co-ownership. She then tells Crestwing she is happy that Crestwing loves Marshall Dillon and that she breeds him wisely and for the betterment of the breed. Then further states that she knows that Marshall is capable of producing wonderful puppies when bred correctly.

WHY THE ANGRY COMMENTS?? Do any of you know how the Crestwing lady intends to breed this boy? Have any of you asked?
Then people come on her and start calling people unethical? Do you know that person? Have you seen their ethics first hand? Where did you get your information? Is it reliable? Proof?

I do not know any of the people involved in this. Maybe I should just turn cheek and mind my own, but I cannot seem to do that in this case.

Why such angry comments about the person who obtained Marshall Dillon? How do you know she does not intend to breed him correctly. Maybe I looked at the wrong website, but her adults have some names in their pedigree

(CH Stardust Spirit Of Bluegrass,
Ch. Ron-Del's Lil' Bita Nitro
and dam is Ch. Ron-Del's Lil Bita Sparkler,
Lil' Blast Jordan Of Siller's Farms
out of Ch. Ron-Del's Lil' Bita TNT
and M-N-M's Chase A Bunny
whose sire is Ch. Chobie's Chu Bear, h.
Glenmar's Lord Of The Rings and
Ch. Glenmar Ribbons and Roses,
CAN CH Glaranik Star Choice, ROM and his dam is
CAN CH Precious Gem Shatzi Gold).

They may not be the names you might chose to breed, however these people took the time and championed out their dogs. They bred them and placed pups that got into this "unethical" persons hands?? It seems like she is obtaining the best she can to have a chance in producing a champion. She at least said that in her post. Maybe there is something that I am just not seeing.
The OP clearly states she hopes that Marshall Dillon can produce wonderful puppies when bred to a quality bitch. Who is to say that with the above names in her dogs pedigrees that her bitches are not quality. I have not seen them, HAVE YOU?

I have really lost a lot of faith in some of the people on here

Originally Posted by golddust

Libral statements are fine opinions are fine....what is wrong is using poeples LEGAL NAMES and KENNEL NAMES on a open forum...and that unfortunately some people sadly have done on this very open forum

Well we weren't the only ones writing names, were we?

And don't you consider a website the internet? Because that's exactly where all the above names came from - Crestwing's website - on the internet! The door swings both ways.

Bottom line is - and everyone has already said this - the problem started with a gal named Diane... but everyone shares a part in this - including Crestwing because she had to have a good idea of what was going on. After all, she said herself that she checks pedigrees - so she knows the breeders and kennels names.