Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkielady06  Now I wanted to quote the original poster here to make sure that I got this right. The OP states that she DID NOT have a contract with this dog. She sold him with full registration. She trusted this person and that person broke her trust and she will now change her ways of selling show dogs and maintain co-ownership. She then tells Crestwing she is happy that Crestwing loves Marshall Dillon and that she breeds him wisely and for the betterment of the breed. Then further states that she knows that Marshall is capable of producing wonderful puppies when bred correctly.
WHY THE ANGRY COMMENTS?? Do any of you know how the Crestwing lady intends to breed this boy? Have any of you asked?
Then people come on her and start calling people unethical? Do you know that person? Have you seen their ethics first hand? Where did you get your information? Is it reliable? Proof?
I do not know any of the people involved in this. Maybe I should just turn cheek and mind my own, but I cannot seem to do that in this case.
Why such angry comments about the person who obtained Marshall Dillon? How do you know she does not intend to breed him correctly. Maybe I looked at the wrong website, but her adults have some names in their pedigrees ( CH Stardust Spirit Of Bluegrass, Ch. Ron-Del's Lil' Bita Nitro and dam is Ch. Ron-Del's Lil Bita Sparkler, Lil' Blast Jordan Of Siller's Farms out of Ch. Ron-Del's Lil' Bita TNT and M-N-M's Chase A Bunny whose sire is Ch. Chobie's Chu Bear, h. Glenmar's Lord Of The Rings and Ch. Glenmar Ribbons and Roses, CAN CH Glaranik Star Choice, ROM and his dam is CAN CH Precious Gem Shatzi Gold). They may not be the names you might chose to breed, however these people took the time and championed out their dogs. They bred them and placed pups that got into this "unethical" persons hands?? It seems like she is obtaining the best she can to have a chance in producing a champion. She at least said that in her post. Maybe there is something that I am just not seeing.
The OP clearly states she hopes that Marshall Dillon can produce wonderful puppies when bred to a quality bitch. Who is to say that with the above names in her dogs pedigrees that her bitches are not quality. I have not seen them, HAVE YOU?
I have really lost a lot of faith in some of the people on here  |
I totally agree!
This whole mess could of been avoided if Diane had done the right thing by Marshall, so the fault lays with her and no one else. If Rosemark had so much trust in Diane, Rosemark's issue is with Diane.
The internet does make the world a very small one, but just because something is posted on a public forum or anywhere on the internet does not make it a fact! I have stated I do not know Crestwing, so I do not know how her dogs are kept.
I will state just because someone does not breed to the standard of the ytca does not mean they treat their dogs badly and just because some is a member of the ytca does not mean their dogs are well kept and loved! People have rights and people have a right to dream and follow their dreams, rather you agree with them or not, rather they are a ytca member or not. I would never post something on a public forum without knowing for a fact it is true with proof to back it up. To be honest I would never post the name of someone and make statements on a public forum, I would personally take it up with the party involved.
Crestwing has rights and just because you may believe she does not breed to the ytca standard, does not make her wrong! The ytca is a club and set the standard as they believe the standard should be set, but they are not god. We all have a right to believe in what we want to believe in.