Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkielady06  That is your take and opinion. My brother is a practicing lawyer and according to him it is how it affects the party involved and the facts. Just because the other cases did not go anywhere means nothing. More suits are being filed each day especially for internet cases, they are rising and rising.
Regardless of that, like is being said here, is it ethical? To make a statement that you have no proof of is opening up that can of worms unto yourself. End of story for me.
The fact remains that Marshall is with the Crestwing lady and she states she is pampering him. I hope he has a good home now and that he is used wisely as the OP stated. I also hope he makes beautiful babies for the new owner and that she can put one of them in the ring to show for it. |
In the show ring? It is my impression that Marshall was not purchased for the show puppies he might produce, only the puppies he would produce to sell. It's exploiting Marshall for his CH. status, something this breeder had nothing to do with earning. How would Sue feel if she had worked hard to bring a dog to it's championship, only to have her dog later used as a marketing tool to sell puppies by someone that had nothing to do with his achievement?
You know, sometimes it's not a matter of what is or isn't legal it's matter of what is right. Whatever happened to holding oneself to a higher standard?