Did Rosemark have a contract with who originally purchased Marshall? If so why did she not include in the contract a clause which would of protected Marshall? For example Marshall could only be rehomed back to her or if she was unable to take Marshall back he would have to be altered before being rehomed! Even if we do not agree with the home Marshall has ended up in the fault does not lay with Crestwing. I do not care who you purchase from or who you sell to, we all need to make sure our dogs are protected. Which means you have to do what is necessary to protect them, which means you may end up in a court of law. I know for a fact a breeder which has a clause in her contract which states if the contract is not followed she will sue for $5,000.00 and I do know she has won in court! Sorry but I do feel Rosemark should of better protected her dog! |