View Single Post
Old 07-30-2010, 10:12 AM   #928
Rhetts_mama
Donating YT 4000 Club Member
 
Rhetts_mama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,959
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkiekist View Post
Just wondering. How can the Akc know in advance if the dog is too small to register?
It would require them revamping their system. Instead of allowing a blanket registration at birth and sale, they could offer a limited/provisional registration. Once the dog reaches maturity, a full registration could then be given if the dog meets standard. This would prevent someone from breeding a small dam/sire and the puppies automatically being given the AKC stamp just because somewhere along the lines they had an ancestor that DID meet standard. The AKC could also do a better job of pulling registrations on people they know are breeding dogs with known health defects in their line if they would just start keeping a data base.

As it is, the AKC stamp really is useless. The general public (if they know about registries at all) think it means they are purchasing a good quality dog. In reality, it means nothing. It's no guarantee of quality, it's no guarantee of a healthy line. It's become a meaningless marketing tool, IMO. "Pure bred" doesn't mean jack if the quality of the dog isn't up to snuff.

Just for kicks, google "AKC registered teacup yorkies" . The number of hits that come back will astound you.

Again, this is JMO. I don't breed, will never breed (though I suppose I should heed Mardelin's advice on another thread and "never say never"- so I will say: I don't plan to breed.)
__________________
Don't get your knickers in a knot. Nothing is solved and it just makes you walk funny.

Last edited by Rhetts_mama; 07-30-2010 at 10:15 AM.
Rhetts_mama is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!