View Single Post
Old 07-28-2010, 08:05 AM   #765
JeanieK
Donating YT 12K Club Member
 
JeanieK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Council Bluffs Iowa
Posts: 12,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhetts_mama View Post
So how is breeding for what is perceived as a fault in color any different than breeding dogs that are too tiny to be healthy? From what I'm reading of the standard, because there is no minimum weight stated, someone with a tiny girl could show and potentially win. - Now I know the breeders here will state that would never happen because the judges all know what is considered a good breed specimen and a 3 lb girl isn't "it". But it's still not listed as a fault when an otherwise healthy dog that meets the standard in every way except being the "wrong" color is considered faulty.

Sorry- I don't mean to be confrontational here, but I truly don't understand the thinking that is going on here with the YTCA.
me either. or those breeders who excuse using dogs that do not meet the standard, in order to better the breed. They didn't better anything. the dog still has the fault and so do half of the offspring. So how did that better the breed.

What it did was to better their line. Not the entire breed.

What we are all dloing is competing with ourselves. trying to make the next generation better than the last. And that is the challenge that keeps us all breeding.
JeanieK is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!