Quote:
Originally Posted by Disney  I like to respond by saying I really admire you respond so politely with no personal attack.  It mean more than you ever understand to me.
You raise valid point, and I do understand where you coming from. I do not voice opinion on subject I no believe I don't know enough about. If I not qualified, I butt out. I has studied parti gene and drawn own conclusions. Simply, my opinion is that they don't fit standard, therefore should not be breed. Don't know enough about the old debate because as you say, I new to this world and also to be honest, my literary skill not strong enough to properly understand pedigree yet.
I stand by opinion that yorkie should only be bred to standard. To me, it unethical to breed outside of standard. This only my opinion.
So while I agree with you on some point, I believe you need understand that you do not know me well enough to say what I do and not know.
Does make sense? |
Disney,
Let me add.....breeding a dog is not as simple as all that....breeding out of standard is.
Let's say you have a dog with a low tail set (a fault), but has all the other attributes that is desired within the standard. As a breeder you would want to correct that fault, so you breed it to a dog that can correct that low tail set faults. There is no perfect dog and a breeder that understands this and canine genetics, knows how to correct faults.....The same with bad ear sets, rears, fronts, laybacks, toplines, etc.