Quote:
Originally Posted by JeanieK  Why is it inconceivable that it is being done to produce better dogs in hopes that in the future they will be allowed in the ring.
We cannot present a very good argument for competing if we don;t have dogs worth of competing.
We hear constantantly that even without considering the color, that they are poor examples of a yorkie. At one time they were produced by champions, then they went comercial and lost a lot. We are trying to bring them back to looking like yorkies of a different color.
Let me ask you this. Are you personally against the YTCA creating a category for the parti color? |
I don't want to offend you in anyway but I don't see the YTCA creating a category for the varitation in color. I am a tradionalist as far as the Yorkshire Terrier is concerned. I like the standard yorkie actually better than the parti but that is my preference. If I wanted to show dogs of different colors I would be in a breed that allows it. I'm sure there are many in the YTCA feel the same way. If we wanted to show dogs of color we would be showing and breeding those breeds instead of the Yorkshire Terrier.
I chose yorkies because of the breed and it's color along with many other things. After I got into showing it made me understand and appreciate the breed and the importance of health, structure, movement and the appreciation of it. I hope that made sense.