Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkiegirl2  I'm talking about wrong colored dogs that the only way to meet the standard is to dye the dog or use color enhancements to obtain the correct color.
Those dogs would not meet the standard if shown without doing so. |
Thanks for clarifying. I understand what you mean...a dog either meets the breed standard, or it doesn't, enhanced or not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkiegirl2 Those who do not like dogs who carry a Parti gene mean little because if a carrier meets the standard then it has every right to be shown.
The dog is after all correctly colored per standard. |
I absolutely agree...it has EVERY right to be shown and to earn it's titles, regardless to if it's a carrier of a fault or not. If it meets the standard, then it meets the standard. Point is, what good does that title really do if every generation after that does does NOT meet that same criteria? How would having a CH sire make any difference if bred to a very poor example of the breed?