Quote:
Originally Posted by kpstoybox  It's only considered a genetic fault by those who want it gone. If you feel the need to scare people away from the parti by comparing it to a bad bite...by all means...that is your prerogative. IMO...it shows how paranoid and desperate some people are concerning the color and it's advancements.
I'm willing to bet the show breeders who are still using the black and tan's, black and gold's and the blue and gold's in their programs do not consider those colors a genetic fault. |
I'm not paranoid or desperate it's called "following" the standard when it comes to showing to the breed representation. Black in color is genetic, blue is genetic, gold is genetic no one disputes that and Black is a fault no one is questioning that.
When one is wanting to get involved in "AKC" showing they have to know the standard and what is considered a fault and what is not allowed in the show ring you educate them on the standard and how is that paranoia? It's called following what is set by the YTCA. Bad bites is not a life threating fault as a color is not it's just fact plain and simple. You breed to the breed standard that is set. That's not paranoia....