06-17-2010, 01:01 PM
|
#38 |
No Longer a Member
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: South Carolina
Posts: 359
| Quote:
Originally Posted by k Owensk9 I've had my bloodline for 15 to 20 years---I don't get bad legs ! I may one day buy a male that has or produces bad legs--but I don't get them now ! I don't think any amount of testing can Guarantee perfect pups. But if your true to never selling-producing-passing on problems. Finally you can breed out any problems---yorkies are bred to be ratters and barn dogs---not low blood sugar--cream puffs. If you breed for health and not just looks you get a well rounded fisty dog. And hopefully healthy as horses ! That's my aim---healthy-- good movement ---happy puppies and adults. If I did get a pup less than healthy I'd find it a forever home and place it FREE ---NO PAPERS ! And the Adults that produced it would be taken out of my breeding program ! | Thats what I'm saying, you want to breed for health so why not health test your dogs? Why take the chance to produce a problem instead of taking the measures to prevent the problem and do the testing. "Bad legs" aren't the only thing effecting yorkies you know, there are other diseases out there that can be detected with health testing. Then you won't have to risk a puppy by breeding a dog that hasn't been health tested. Even yorkies who are still ratters and "barn dogs" should be health tested. If not then how can you insure it is health enough to do it job properly? |
| |