Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhetts_mama  The OP states that yorkiegirl2 was defaming her.
Defamation is the issuance of a false statement about another person, which causes that person to suffer harm
I don't see anything that rises to the level of defamation. Was the puppy having seizures: Yep, that's proven by the video. Was the puppy inbred? Yep, the pedigree proves that. Whether that is common practice or not, it's still a true and accurate statement.
Yorkiegirl2: I'm glad the puppy was placed with someone who had the sense to neuter him and was able to continue treatments. |
Obviously if the OP is posting this after her 5 year ordeal, it has caused her to suffer harm. Wether it's mentally, emotionally, financially or what ever, she's been affected by what her buyer has posted. It's claimed (from the posted links) that the OP is a bad breeder and that the pups seizure was
Possibly caused by the half brother/sister breeding, this wasn't proven and seizures even ended after changing foods, but the OP is still being called a bad breeder?
My guess if the OP felt that she was at fault, she would just ignored the situation but by coming on her to defend herself it seems that she's just had enough.