View Single Post
Old 05-30-2010, 08:22 PM   #29
megansmomma
Donating YT 10K Club Member
 
megansmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: S. W. Suburbs of Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwerten View Post
only difference is a little less bacteria BIG DEAL nothing else you will see on a cysto than a free catch so not worth the risk and when they did blood work for demi's dental the first dentist did the blood work wanted to do cysto and i asked about risk and she said she had seen one incident where the bladder was damaged and said NO THANK YOU done we will continue with free catch. This is when i called jean and ims and both said not really necessary to do cysto. I am 100% comfortable with my decision. Feel free to do it with your dogs not happening with mine.
You are not understanding what I am trying to say to you. Then entire process that you are going through to catch a little urine is just overkill. Do you not understand sterile technique? There is NOTHING sterile with the way that you are doing you collection. You could take the syringe and rinse it out and toss it into the draw and it would make a difference. It is total over kill.

Of course a doctor would tell you about risk. It is part of a consent to have the knowledge of all that could happen. That is medicine. When you have any procedure that is always a risk and you need be made aware of the possible risks. You should be told of ALL risks prior to make an INFORMED decision. Have you ever read your consent prior to any surgery? I'm talking human not animal. You could be having a hang nail removed and one of the risk could be death.

You way of thinking about thing that have to do with the medical profession is skewed. What you are just does not make sense to me.
__________________
“Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.” Mark Twain
megansmomma is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!