Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogie Man  In this case, the defendant was selling videos of dog fights. He was not out trying to create awareness of animal cruelty. Here's a quote from an older story about this: "Stevens was convicted in January of three counts of selling depictions of animal cruelty. He never denied selling tapes like "Pick-A-Winna," on which he described dogfighting like a sportscaster calling a televised boxing match".
Here's the link.... Pet-Abuse.Com - Animal Abuse Case Details: Selling dog-fighting videos - Pittsville, VA (US) |
So he was making dog fight videos to sell...not making videos telling about the abuse of dog fights
Goodness! He should have been convicted for promoting animal cruelty. This is where the laws need to be more detailed so people can't just water down issues and get away with horrible things under free speech rights.