View Single Post
Old 03-31-2010, 09:30 AM   #24
BamaFan121s
Donating YT 10K Club Member
 
BamaFan121s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 11,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvMyPuppE View Post
when you said that, i was just thinking - if there weren't breeders then people wanting a pet would get one of those pets without homes rather than buying one - don't you agree?
It's funny because while you are thinking along that line, I'm thinking, if there weren't unethical breeders and breeders who didn't enforce a s/n agreement from the get-go, then there wouldn't be so many pets without homes. In addition to, if there weren't responsible breeders and only homeless pets to choose from, then who would keep the established breeds we love going?

The difference is supplying very few, say well under 10, dogs to pet homes as a breeder vs producing multiple litters strictly for pet purposes and placing, say, 20-30 dogs, with no s/n agreement in pet homes per year. I think this is one of those things that not just black and white, but where there is a huge gray area to consider too.
BamaFan121s is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!