Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  I know I'm going to get a lot of flack for this, but those dogs were not good representatives of the breed. I doubt if any of them should have been bred. It seems like the major criteria for picking a breeder was size, with many of the males listed as three pounds and under. Several things that bothered me were all the proclamations of the Christianity, and waving the flag. I guess atheists and commies need not apply. I think this is used in an attempt to seem reputable, instead of being reputable. I do not like it when breeders have a payment method on their website, it means that they aren't placing dogs, they are selling them to anyone who comes along with the money. I did not notice a health guarantee, however I did notice that the "Vet. Health Certificate is $25.00." They don't even do a health check on their puppies unless you pay extra? It's sad that many so called rescues work with places like this, and aren't really rescues, but are really puppy brokers. |
I saw that earlier and had the same thought about the look of the yorkies. I know my boy is completely not-representative of the standard, so I thought I had no right to criticize. Their face seems lacking in the hair department. They were cute, but not what I expected to see in quality breeding stock.